#NYT: US mineral deal offers no security guarantees for Ukraine
![]() 479 Tuesday, 25 February, 2025, 16:32 The current U.S. proposal regarding Ukraine's critical minerals seeks 50% of revenues from Ukraine's natural resources while offering no security guarantees in return, according to a draft of the agreement seen by the New York Times (NYT). The terms of the revised draft are virtually the same as those of an earlier version rejected by President Volodymyr Zelensky, the NYT reported, citing a draft of the agreement dated Feb. 21. In some cases, the U.S. demands are even more stringent. The agreement demands 50% of revenues from Ukraine's natural resources, including critical minerals, oil, and gas, as well as stakes in ports and other key infrastructure through a joint investment fund. The new version says that the U.S. would hold a 100% financial interest in this fund, and that Ukraine should contribute to the fund until it reaches $500 billion. When Zelensky then refused to sign the proposed agreement on the grounds that it offered no security guarantees, Trump lashed out at the Ukrainian president, echoing Kremlin talking points by calling him an "unelected dictator." |
"Over 1,100 people detained in four days of protests in Turkey" - Ministry of Internal Affairs (video)
276Yesterday, 15:39Peskov: "The Black Sea Initiative is being discussed in Riyadh" (video)
293Yesterday, 15:03Ozgur Ozel։ "Imamoglu is in prison on the one hand and on the way to the presidency on the other" (video)
244Yesterday, 13:33South Korean Prime Minister Han Duck-soo was reinstated in his position
295Yesterday, 12:14"What mechanism will function in case of violation of the peace agreement points?": A question to Paruyr Hovhannisyan (video)
161Yesterday, 11:54Decottignies: "Syunik is an inalienable part of the territory of Armenia"
178Yesterday, 11:37Witkoff։ "We don't need to solve everything militarily. But we would under certain circumstances"
242Yesterday, 11:21Israel Defense Forces claims to have eliminated Hamas officials in Gaza
170Yesterday, 10:38